Elijah Craig Barrel Proof, B525

I’d like to thank Heaven Hill for providing this sample with no strings attached.

IMAGE: Bottle of Elijah Craig Barrel Proof bourbon, batch B525, labeled 11 years, 6 months old and 126.2 proof, sitting on a wooden deck with lush green trees in the background.

Headed off to the dentist in a little bit to get a tiny cavity filled before it turns into something worse. I’m assuming my face will be numb and I’ll be miserable afterward, so I’m trying to get this out before I need to leave. And there isn’t much time left, so let’s make this one short.

We’ve covered these releases many times before, so I think most of us already know what’s going on with them. But if you’re new, here’s the short, short version: Elijah Craig used to be a 12-year-old product. Just before it transitioned to a non-age-stated (NAS) version, a companion “Barrel Proof” offering was released. That product stayed 12 years old even after the NAS transition and became a three-times-yearly release. A few cycles ago, they dropped the 12-year age statement as a standard and now just list how old each particular batch is. Most have been right around 12 years, though at least one has been older. The batch code helps you track it: the letter (A, B, or C) tells you if the bottle in your hands is from the first, second, or third release of the year. The first number is the month of release, and the last two digits are the year.

Okay, now that that’s out of the way, let’s dig in and see if it’s any good.

Elijah Craig Barrel Proof, B525

Purchase Info: This sample was sent to me at no charge for review purposes. The suggested retail price is $74.99.

Price per Drink (50 mL): $5.00

Details: 63.1% ABV. 11 years, 6 months old

Nose: Pretty typical Heaven Hill profile: vanilla, caramel, cinnamon, and oak.

Mouth: Hot and sweet with notes of cinnamon, wintergreen, vanilla, honey, and oak.

Finish: Medium length and warm with notes of honey, cinnamon, and oak.

IMAGE: A hand-drawn smile that indicates I like this particualr release.

Thoughts: I like the nose on this one. It smells like bourbon—like, if you were making a “bourbon-scented” item, this would be your template. The mouth is as warm as you'd expect at over 120 proof. Nice heat and sweetness. I’m digging the honey notes on both the palate and the finish, and the mouthfeel reinforces that with a thick, rich texture. This is quite good. I really like it.

Oh, and since I was whining about the price of the last Heaven Hill product I covered, I should mention that this one continues to be much more reasonably priced compared to Old Fitz Bonded. It’s only about $6.50 per year of age. Fair is fair, and I don’t want to be called a hypocrite for calling out high pricing without acknowledging the opposite.

Comparison to last time: A125 is much less cinnamon-forward than B525. The mouth on A125 is sweeter and oakier. As always, both of these are very tasty—but B525 has a little extra oomph that puts it over the top for us.


If you want to support our work at BourbonGuy.com, please consider a one-time donation at ko-fi.com/bourbonguy or paypal.me/BourbonGuy. Or you could buy some merch that I’ve designed and/or built (tasting journals, t-shirts, stickers, pins, signs, posters, and more) at BourbonGuyGifts.com. Use code BOURBONGUYREADER at checkout for 5% off any order of $50 or more.

Old Fitzgerald Bottled-in-Bond Decanter Series Spring 2025

I’d like to thank Heaven Hill for providing this sample with no strings attached.

IMAGE: Bottle of Old Fitzgerald Bottled-in-Bond Spring 2025 Edition bourbon, labeled 100 proof and 9 years old, sitting on a wooden deck with green foliage and an American flag in the background.

Hello friends! I’m back! Hopefully, you noticed that I was away last week…

Anyway. I was in a very tiny RV, driving to and from Knoxville, TN. Now you may ask: Why Knoxville? There are so many other places in the country to drive a tiny RV to. Why would you not choose (insert your favorite place to drive a tiny RV here)?

Well, the answer to that is basically a giant shrug. I have no idea why we decided on Knoxville proper. We have our usual birthday/anniversary trip planned for September and wanted to test out our probable method of transportation. We had the idea that it would be fun to take a September trip to Northern California in a drivable RV. My wife has always had the fantasy that she’d enjoy the smallest vans made. You know—the super small kind that fits into a parking spot with little trouble. Something cute.

The issue with that is… they’re also super small on the inside. I found that out when I needed to pee, couldn’t actually fit in the toilet area (vertically at all or horizontally comfortably), and had to stand in the “kitchen/hallway” and just aim at the toilet to relieve myself. (I happen to be a very good aim, having had almost 50 years of practice.) Toss in assorted tripping and stumbling hazards and we realized that, if nothing else, the layout was just shit. But also that we really could use a bit more space—and a “lounging area” that wasn’t just the driver’s and passenger’s seats flipped around. After driving all day, those were the last seats we wanted to be in while trying to relax.

Now, as to why Knoxville? First off, there are a couple of National Park Units there. One of them is the second of three units in the Manhattan Project National Historical Park. We visited Los Alamos around this time last year, so picking up the second of three interlocking passport stamps felt like a fun goal. But more importantly, this was a trial run that allowed me to test the various ways we plan to spend our overnights during the September trip. We tried Harvest Hosts, campgrounds, and hotels—just to see how Mr. Tiny would handle itself (that’s what I referred to the RV as in my head, don’t get any weird ideas just because I mentioned peeing earlier). And best of all, if something did go wrong (which it did), we were in a populated area—or at least more populated than Wyoming or the Nevada desert.

But the best part of going to Tennessee? We passed through Kentucky twice and had many opportunities to spend almost as much on bourbon as I did on the RV. We’ll probably have a lot of bonus posts this summer to go through the things I picked up. But for now, let’s get on to tonight’s bourbon—which I did not get while away.

Tonight’s bourbon is the latest release in Heaven Hill’s Old Fitzgerald Bottled-in-Bond Decanter Series—this one being the Spring 2025 release. As always, this release uses the Heaven Hill wheated bourbon mashbill and meets the requirements to be labeled bottled-in-bond. It is nine years old and bottled at 100 proof.

Old Fitzgerald has a long history. It was the flagship product of the Old Stitzel-Weller distillery (of Pappy Van Winkle fame). After being purchased by Heaven Hill, it eventually slid down the ranks of prestige, having qualified for more than one Bottom-Shelf Bracket back when we adhered to strict pricing rules for that series. A few years ago, though, the bottled-in-bond version was relaunched as a prestige offering. The average price was about $10 per year of age—a big jump from the twenty-something dollars per bottle it had previously carried. These days, the price has increased even more to about $14 per year of age, which is quite the jump.

Disappointing as a frugal person, but not unexpected for someone who follows the bourbon industry. Anyway, let’s dig in and see if this is worth the price.

Old Fitzgerald Bottled-in-Bond, Spring 2025

Purchase Info: This sample was sent to me at no charge for review purposes. The suggested retail price is $129.99.

Price per Drink (50 mL): $8.67

Details: 50% ABV, 9 years old.

Nose: Caramel, vanilla, spearmint, and oak.

Mouth: Caramel, vanilla, cinnamon, leather, and oak.

Finish: Medium in both length and warmth. Notes of cacao nibs, vanilla, cinnamon, oak, and just a hint of spearmint.

IMAGE: A hand-drawn smiley face. This denotes a “like” rating.

Thoughts: Though I am not a fan of Heaven Hill deviating from their prior pricing plan of the MSRP being $10 per year aged, if you’re the sort of person willing to pay $130 for a bottle of bourbon, you won’t be disappointed in paying that for this one. If anything could be said to be worth that price, this would be. I’ve had far worse bourbon for more money. Because this is absolutely delicious—it’s rich and thick, and the oak-derived notes of leather and cacao are probably my favorite part of this one. Big fan.


If you want to support our work at BourbonGuy.com, please consider a one-time donation at ko-fi.com/bourbonguy or paypal.me/BourbonGuy. Or you could buy some merch that I’ve designed and/or built (tasting journals, t-shirts, stickers, pins, signs, posters, and more) at BourbonGuyGifts.com. Use code BOURBONGUYREADER at checkout for 5% off any order of $50 or more.

Bernheim Barrel Proof Wheat Whiskey, A225

I’d like to thank Heaven Hill for sending this sample with no strings attached.

IMAGE: A bottle of Bernheim Original Barrel Proof Kentucky Straight Wheat Whiskey (Batch A225) sits on a wooden railing outdoors, with a blurred rural background.

Looking at that image above, you’d think that Spring had sprung here in Minnesota. And you’d have been forgiven for thinking that. Until today, we hadn’t had any measurable snow that actually stuck around this year. Heck, I was wearing shorts outside for most of the last month (don’t read too much into that—I just seem to be well adapted to the cold).

That all changed this morning when nearly a foot of heavy, wet snow dropped overnight. And I mean heavy. I fired up the big snowblower, and even that wasn’t enough to handle it in one pass. The plow ridge at the end of the driveway was a solid 18 to 24 inches high and about three feet deep—pure heart attack snow. But I can’t complain too much. Before today, that big snowblower had only been used once in the last couple of years.

What I can do, however, is sit down with a late-afternoon whiskey to recover from the physical labor of clearing the driveway and sidewalk. And if that whiskey happens to be tonight’s pour, I certainly wouldn’t be upset.

Bernheim Barrel Proof is, as the name suggests, a barrel-proof version of Heaven Hill’s Bernheim Wheat Whiskey. The mash bill is 51% wheat, 37% corn, and 12% malted barley. This batch was aged between seven and nine years before being bottled at a hefty 125.4 proof. The A225 designation means this is the first batch (A) of 2025 (25), released in February (2). The suggested retail price is $66.99.

Let’s dig in, shall we?

Bernheim Barrel Proof A225

Purchase Info: This sample was provided at no charge for review purposes. The suggested retail price is $66.99 for a 750 mL bottle.

Price per Drink (50 mL): $4.47

Details: 62.7% ABV. Mash bill: 51% wheat, 37% corn, 12% malted barley

Nose: Caramel, mint, oak, vanilla, cinnamon, and cocoa.

Mouth: Hot and spicy, with notes of cinnamon, vanilla, caramel, mint, and cocoa.

Finish: Long and hot, with lingering notes of cinnamon, toffee, and cocoa.

IMAGE: A hand-drawn smiley face. This means I like it.

Thoughts: Whooo-boy! This one is hot! But it takes water well—adding a splash tames the heat and lets the flavors open up without losing complexity. Speaking of complexity, this might have the most layered nose I’ve ever found on a Bernheim product. I really like this one.

Comparison to Last Time: A225 is more complex on the nose and sweeter overall. On the palate, while B924 was still rich and hot, it had more grain-forward notes, whereas A225 leans more into barrel influence. Between the two, I much prefer A225.


If you want to support our work at BourbonGuy.com, please consider a one-time donation at ko-fi.com/bourbonguy or paypal.me/BourbonGuy. Or you could buy some merch that I’ve designed and/or built (tasting journals, t-shirts, stickers, pins, signs, posters, and more) at BourbonGuyGifts.com. Use code BOURBONGUYREADER at checkout for 5% off any order of $50 or more.

Elijah Craig Barrel Proof, A125

I’d like to thank Heaven Hill for providing this review sample with no strings attached.

IMAGE: A bottle of Elijah Craig Barrel Proof bourbon labeled "Batch A125," showcasing its rich amber color, set on a wooden railing with a blurred backyard scene in the background.

Another year, another round of Barrel Proof Heaven Hill releases. These things are always good, with only slight differences between them. But they keep sending them, so I keep reviewing them. I mean, it’s more fun to taste whiskey when you know it’ll be good before you even open the bottle. Some of the bottles I receive are unknown, and there’s always that little bit of fear that I’m about to put something horrible in my mouth. And no one wants to put something horrible in their mouth.

I’ve talked to women before.

Before we dig into how this whiskey tastes, we should probably discuss what it is. Well, Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A125 is, as the name suggests, a barrel-proof version of Elijah Craig. The A125 designation is a bit more complicated but not too bad. A denotes the release order of the calendar year: A = first, B = second, C = third. 1 is the month of the release—January, in this case. 25 is the year of release (it’s now 2025, in case you were unaware). So, A125 means this is the first release of the year, released in January 2025.

OK, now let’s get a drink. I, for one, could use one.

Elijah Craig Barrel Proof, A125

Purchase Info: This sample was sent at no charge for review purposes. The suggested retail price is $74.99 for a 750 mL bottle.

Price per Drink (50 mL): $5.00

Details: 59.1% ABV. 10 years, 7 months old.

Nose: Caramel, oak, vanilla custard, and nutmeg.

Mouth: Follows the nose with notes of caramel, vanilla custard, spicy cinnamon, nutmeg, and oak.

Finish: Hot and long with baking spices and vanilla custard.

IMAGE: This is a hand drawn smiley face graphic. It signifys that I like this bourbon.

Thoughts: This is really, really good. As usual. I haven’t run across a single release in this series that isn’t delicious. That said, some are slightly better or worse than others, so let’s look at a comparison.

Comparison to Last Time: The nose is similar, but C924 is sweeter. C924 is hotter and spicier, while A125 showcases a lot more sweet vanilla. Both finishes are hot and pretty long. Both take water well, though C924 doesn’t show many changes with a little water, while A125 amps up the sweetness.

Both are delicious, but if forced to choose, both my wife and I would pick A125.


If you want to support our work at BourbonGuy.com, please consider a one-time donation at ko-fi.com/bourbonguy or paypal.me/BourbonGuy. Or you could buy some merch that I’ve designed and/or built (tasting journals, t-shirts, stickers, pins, signs, posters, and more) at BourbonGuyGifts.com. Use code BOURBONGUYREADER at checkout for 5% off any order of $50 or more.